Claira works inside Nuix Discover. It reads the documents in the case, codes them the way your team would, and explains its calls. You spend your time on the parts of the job that need your judgment.
Claira reads the documents’ metadata in this case, with your access, and writes an overview from what it counts. It never reads the documents themselves.
41,208Documents
14Custodians
1999 to 2002Date range
6Imports and ingestions
Documents by month1999 to 2002
The assessment
A mid-sized case of 41,208 documents across 14 custodians. Email is 71% of the set. Volume spikes from October to December 2000, when trading desk correspondence with Castellan triples; three custodians go silent in March 2001. Suggested first segment: the West Desk mailboxes, October 2000 to February 2001.
Review MandateDRAFT
Updated 3 sections
PartiesNorthwind Energy (claimant) and Castellan Refining. Traders on the West Desk; outside counsel at Hale & Morrow.
Background & claimsBreach of a 2000 supply agreement over NXC1 end-of-life trades; Northwind alleges Castellan repriced after confirmation.
Key dates & amounts27 December 2000 confirmation emails; 14.2M in dispute; notice of default 9 March 2001.
⚠ Missing informationClaira could not find these in the documents. Add the answers to the sections above; the next generation checks them again.
Parties: Which party does our firm represent: Northwind Energy or Castellan Refining?
Claims: Which request for production does this review answer?
Answer with AgentHide for now
Bulk Scanning41,208 documents selected
SC014 · Relevance + Privilege41,208 / 41,208
8,736Relevant
589Privileged
260Needs review
CancelSend to background
CLAIRA-018440Privilegedconf 0.91
Email between Castellan’s GC and outside counsel seeking advice on the repricing notice. Legal advice is the dominant purpose.
CLAIRA-009213Relevantconf 0.96
Trader confirms the NXC1 volumes and price on 27 December; directly addresses the disputed confirmation.
CLAIRA-022871Not relevantconf 0.88
Fantasy football standings circulated to the desk. No bearing on the agreement.
CLAIRA-031007Needs reviewconf 0.58
Mentions "the Castellan fix" without saying what was fixed. Could refer to the price or to a system issue.
Consolidated Case Chronology⤓ Download Insight
IN016 · Bulk task #014 · 85 documents read
Read 85 AI results
Writing the Insight
Checking references
DEC
27
2000
West Desk traders confirm NXC1 end-of-life volumes and price with Castellan by email.
R. OkaforCastellan trading3 documents ⌄
JAN
12
2001
Castellan issues a revised price schedule for the same trades, citing a "confirmation error".
M. LindqvistNorthwind2 documents ⌄
MAR
9
2001
Northwind serves notice of default; three custodians stop emailing the desk the same week.
Hale & MorrowNorthwind GC4 documents ⌄
Made for Canadian litigation.
Hosted in Canada, in English and French, with the terms, templates and privacy rules Canadian teams work with.
Canadian terms and privilegeAffidavits of documents, solicitor-client and litigation privilege, and the Sedona Canada Principles, built into the templates.
Personal information, the Canadian wayPII templates that know SINs, provincial health numbers and the obligations under PIPEDA and Quebec’s Law 25.
Sovereign by defaultDocuments are processed in Canada, and the encryption keys stay there too. The interface and every export work in English and French.
Designed to be defensible.
Claira runs as a pane inside Nuix Discover. It uses your fields, your permissions and your security perimeter, and its calls can be checked, explained and exported.
It works inside Nuix Neo Discover, explains its reasoning clearly and genuinely reduces review time and cost on every matter. We selected Claira as our exclusive AI partner in Australia and New Zealand because it delivers what legal teams actually need: speed, transparency and defensible results.
Kate ClarkCEO, eDiscoveryCollab
✓Reasoning you can checkClaira can write its reasoning, and a confidence score where the review asks for one, to a Discover field you can search, export and hand to opposing counsel.
✓Nothing is keptDocument content is processed per request and not stored. We can’t look at your documents, even when you ask us to.
✓Your data stays in CanadaData residency in Canada, Australia, Germany, the UK, the US and Brazil, each deployment in-country with customer-managed encryption keys.
✓Models that don’t learn from youEvery AI provider in Claira is barred from training on, keeping or sharing your content. You can also bring your own model.
✓A complete recordInstructions, revisions, approvals and exports are logged, and the history exports to Excel.
✓You approve the workThe Agent proposes scans and edits and waits for your go-ahead. Your admin decides how much it may do on its own.
Build the case for using Claira.
Four numbers in, a one-page memo out, written for your partner, your GC or your client. We email it to you formatted and ready to forward.
To:Managing partnerSubject:First-pass review on Northwind v. Castellan: a proposal
We have 41,000 documents on Northwind v. Castellan and 3 weeks. By hand, that is roughly 745 reviewer hours, or 8 reviewers full-time until the deadline.
745reviewer hours by hand
CA$55,909by hand at CA$75/hr
559reviewer hours saved
~5hfor Claira’s first pass
Claira reads the documents inside our existing Discover case and codes them for relevance and privilege, with written reasoning we can check. The first pass takes about 5 hours. Our reviewers then check what Claira flags, roughly a quarter of the set. Documents are processed per request, never stored, and stay in-country. Claira is billed per case, per month, so the cost sits with this matter.
I suggest we run an early case assessment this week and decide from what it shows.
