Is AI-assisted review defensible?
Yes, when decisions can be explained and checked. Claira can record its reasoning, and a confidence score where the review asks for one, in Discover fields you can export.
Defensibility comes from process, not from the tool alone. Courts and regulators look for a method you can explain, results you can test, and a record of what was done.
Claira supports each part. You test instructions on single documents until they code the way your team would. Claira’s reasoning, and a confidence score where the review asks for one, can be written to Discover fields, so reviewers can check a call and opposing counsel can be shown it. Instructions, revisions, approvals and exports are logged, and the history exports to Excel.
Per-matter validation is available on every engagement, so you can measure how the first pass performed against human review before relying on it.