After the demo

Everything your team needs to say yes.

Thanks for taking the time. This page is a follow-up resource for your team - everything you'll want to share with the people at your firm who need to weigh in before you bring Claira into a matter.

Pick the role that matters for your next conversation. Each section has a short summary and the materials written specifically for that audience.

claira
Prompt
Prompt
Summarize this document in five sentences.
Save Prompt
Quickstart
Try it yourself

See Claira on one of your own documents.

Send us a single document - a statement of claim, a sample email, anything non-privileged - and we'll run a relevance scan and return the output within one business day. No login required. No data retained.

A quick refresher

Generative AI for legal evidence, inside Nuix.

Tiers 1 and 2 of legal AI touch the workflow around the case. Tier 3 - where Claira lives - is the layer that touches the actual evidence. That's where the volume, the cost, and the defensibility risk all live.

Tier 1
General chatbots
ChatGPT, Claude, Copilot, Gemini
Tier 2
Legal copilots
CoCounsel, Harvey, Spellbook, Lexis+ AI
Tier 3
Evidence review AI
Purpose-built to read the record, with an audit trail
Claira
Pick your audience

Resources written for the people who need to weigh in.

Every firm has a different approval path. Instead of one generic deck, here's the material for each stakeholder - written for them, not for you.

Why firm leadership is approving Claira now - defensibility, competitive positioning, and the shift from 'are you using AI' to 'where, and how well.'

Defensibility and ethics

Claira recommends.
A human decides.
Every time.

Aligned with Canadian law society guidance on competence, confidentiality, and supervision of AI-assisted legal work. The reviewer owns the final legal judgement on every document.

Claira output
Draft summary of the document
Suggested relevance decision with reasoning
Suggested issue tagging with citations to content
Written to a Nuix field, not applied as coding
Human action
Review and edit the suggested answer
Approve or reject the coding recommendation
Supervise prompt quality at the project level
Own the final legal judgement on every document
TASK_ID
PROMPT_TEXT
TIMESTAMP
REVIEWER
MODEL_VERSION
DOCUMENT_ID

Still have questions?

Reply to the email thread, or reach us directly. We respond within one business day.